For my global revision process for the Social Media Project, I first read through what my peers commented on my paper. Then I jotted down what I wanted to do with what they (Grace and Kayleigh) had said, and how it will improve my writing. I reread my paper and thought about what I thought needed to be touched on, and then I began to improve my paper. Like most people, I started from the beginning and made my way down. I added explanations and quotes to my writing to make my points clearer and easy to follow. I realized I did my Barclay paragraph wrong and revisited it. I added a stronger and clearer naysayer because both Grace and Kayleigh told me to make the naysayer more prominent. I then more to the conclusion to tie in what I added in the rest of my paper. Although it is a tedious process, it made my paper much better.

One thought on “Global Revision Process- SM Project”

  1. Hi, Sarah,
    Thanks for posting your update. Try to use more writing terms (the way you used “naysayer”) to explain your changes. It seems that you found your peers’ comments helpful. I look forward to reading your revision!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *