For my global revision process for the Social Media Project, I first read through what my peers commented on my paper. Then I jotted down what I wanted to do with what they (Grace and Kayleigh) had said, and how it will improve my writing. I reread my paper and thought about what I thought needed to be touched on, and then I began to improve my paper. Like most people, I started from the beginning and made my way down. I added explanations and quotes to my writing to make my points clearer and easy to follow. I realized I did my Barclay paragraph wrong and revisited it. I added a stronger and clearer naysayer because both Grace and Kayleigh told me to make the naysayer more prominent. I then more to the conclusion to tie in what I added in the rest of my paper. Although it is a tedious process, it made my paper much better.

One thought on “Global Revision Process- SM Project

  1. Hi, Sarah,
    Thanks for posting your update. Try to use more writing terms (the way you used “naysayer”) to explain your changes. It seems that you found your peers’ comments helpful. I look forward to reading your revision!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *