The social media project was one of the last papers I did, and so my critiquing skills had developed to be actually helpful to my peers, and so was their advice to me. I engaged in critical critiquing by reading peoples paper all the way through to get a good feel for what they were writing about, and then go back and make my statements about what the claims and main ideas are. I would also put in a comment if something didn’t make sense or needed to be expanded upon. One thing in our papers we need to have is a naysayer, and for peer reviewing we had to point it out to really make sure it was visible to the audiences. Here is a link to a peer’s paper that will demonstrate my critiquing skills:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1URLzujxBr9qkxJI7GmK7wbqzarc5JeD13b8Kj9WbfRo/edit